601 Labs — Singapore · Data & Decisions

From data to decisions the business can trust.

601 Labs is the lab and portfolio of Ahamed Kamal. The work below is real — anomaly detection, forecasting and recovery planning, journey analytics, and human-in-the-loop GenAI — told as what the problem was, what I did, and what I learned. Client and employer names left out on purpose; the thinking is the point.

// case studies

Selected work

Five problems, and the principle each one taught. Charts are illustrative — representative numbers, drawn to show the idea, not real data.

Anomaly Detection · evolved

Finding the signal that actually matters

Problem

In large, segmented pipelines, abnormal movements hide in plain sight — and naïve alerts either miss them or cry wolf on every wobble.

Approach

I evolved the method in stages: from a fixed threshold, to a global Z-score, to a Z-score computed within each Region × Segment peer group, to an incremental deviation — or “jump” — analysis that scores change over a rolling window rather than raw level.

What I learned

Context is the whole game. A number is only an outlier relative to its own peer group and its own recent trajectory — and a sudden jump often matters far more than a high or low level.

jumpjumptime →value
Fixed thresholdZ-scoreGrouped Z-scoreJump analysis
Forecasting · recovery planning

From a slipping target to a credible path back

Problem

A region or channel is falling behind plan, and leadership needs more than a gloomy forecast — they need a believable way to close the gap.

Approach

Seasonality- and recency-weighted forecasting, made robust with winsorized estimates so a few extreme points don’t distort the baseline; a close-the-gap (CGAP) analysis to size the shortfall; then a recovery plan that allocates uplift where it’s actually achievable.

What I learned

A forecast is only useful if it’s robust to noise and paired with an action. Prediction without a recovery path is just a number; the value is showing the route back to target.

targetgapactualrecovery pathquarter →
Automation · human-in-the-loop GenAI

Giving analysts their hours back

Problem

Skilled analysts were losing whole mornings turning finished analysis into decks and emails — the least valuable use of their time.

Approach

A human-in-the-loop pipeline (Python, Apps Script, Colab) that pulls the analysis, drafts the narrative with GenAI, and ships formatted reports and emails — with a human reviewing before anything goes out.

What I learned

Automation earns trust only with a person in the loop. The win isn’t removing people — it’s removing the drudgery so human judgment gets the time it deserves.

Manual reporting~8 hoursAutomated pipelineunder 45 min
Analytics · customer journey

Where intent forms, and where it leaks

Problem

Top-line volume told us how many people showed up, but not where in the journey intent was forming — or quietly draining away.

Approach

Mapped the multi-stage journey, scored stage-to-stage conversion, and isolated both the high-drop segments and the high-intent paths worth doubling down on.

What I learned

The biggest gains hide at the transitions, not the totals. Where people drop between stages tells you more than any single stage’s headline number.

Reached100%Engaged64%-36Qualified38%-26Intent29%-9Converted21%-8largest leak flagged
Tooling · building with AI

One builder, team-scale leverage

Problem

As an individual, how far can you get by orchestrating AI rather than hand-coding everything?

Approach

Built 601 Labs AI Desk — a multi-model workspace that routes a question across several frontier models and composes the result — and an AI resume-and-interview tool, shipped in an afternoon.

What I learned

With good orchestration, one person can build in hours what used to take a team days. The scarce skill is no longer typing the code — it’s knowing what to point the model at, and whether to trust what comes back.

workfloworchestrationClaudeGeminiGPTshipped output
// methods

How the work gets done

The techniques behind the case studies — from robust statistics to applied GenAI.

Z-score & grouped Z-score Incremental deviation (jump) analysis Winsorized robust statistics Seasonality & recency modelling Close-the-gap (CGAP) analysis Forecasting & scenario planning Funnel & journey analytics Human-in-the-loop GenAI Python Apps Script Colab BigQuery SQL Decision intelligence
// about

The person behind the lab

I'm Ahamed Kamal, a data & AI strategy leader based in Singapore with 15 years across enterprise BI transformation, data architecture, applied AI, forecasting, and executive decision intelligence.

My strength is working from the business problem backwards: framing ambiguous questions with senior stakeholders, choosing the right data, BI, or AI approach, and driving it through design, delivery, and adoption. AI is how I build faster — the value is knowing what's worth building and whether to trust the result.

601 Labs is where I keep the things I build and the things I'm learning. It may grow into something more.

Have a data problem worth solving?